NOTE: this competition is closed. A new competition is expected to be announced in September 2010.
Two types of doctoral award are offered for applicants in any discipline:
Awards are tenable only at UK universities that are on the list provided by the
Commonwealth Scholarships Commission in the
UK:
www.cscuk.org.uk/2009ScholarshipstoDevelopedCommonwealth.asp
*
*This link leads to a site belonging to an entity not subject to the
Official Languages Act. Information on this site is available in the
language of the site.
Awards are to obtain one degree and funding will not be extended to enable applicants to complete an additional or higher qualification than that for which the selection was made. Scholarships are for full-time study only and no other courses of study may be undertaken at the same time.
The split-site award comprises two options:
Split-site award holders who have not yet commenced their doctoral degree at the time of application will be eligible to spend a maximum of six months in the UK during their first year of study.
The level of financial support given towards the costs of family maintenance in the UK is under review. The following rates currently apply but changes are expected.
Note : The Commission's spouse and family allowances represent only a contribution towards the costs of family maintenance in the UK and scholars should expect and be able to supplement these allowances to support family members who choose to come to the UK .
The Commonwealth Scholarship and Fellowship Plan (CSFP) was established in 1959, with the first scholars selected in 1960. The Plan was suggested in an influential speech by Sidney Smith, a former President of the University of Toronto and later Canadian Minister of External Affairs, in September 1958. The goal of the Plan is to nurture educational links among Commonwealth countries and to strengthen the ideals upon which the Commonwealth was founded. Over 25,000 Commonwealth citizens have held awards - many going on to reach the very highest levels of their profession. For further background on the CSFP, visit: www.csfp-online.org/ * *This link leads to a site belonging to an entity not subject to the Official Languages Act. Information on this site is available in the language of the site.
The chief contributors of awards with the Plan are Canada and the UK , but 20 countries have offered awards over its 50-year lifespan.
Currently the UK offers awards to Canadians for doctoral study under the Plan which is managed in the UK by the Commonwealth Scholarship Commission of the United Kingdom * and by The British Council . * *These links leads to sites belonging to an entity not subject to the Official Languages Act. Information on these sites is available in the language of the sites.
The CSCUK is responsible for final selection and academic matters. The British Council is responsible for payments to scholars and for arranging travel, reception and other services.
Applicants must:
In addition, applicants:
*For TOEFL, GMAT and GRE information, visit the HELP page.
Applicants for split-site awards must:
Instructions
Please read this section carefully before completing the online application. This information is provided by the Commonwealth Scholarship Commission in the UK , which makes the final selection from applicants nominated by the Canadian Scholarships Selection Committee.
Factors taken into account in Assessment of Applications can be found on the following link: www.cscuk.org.uk/docs/SelectionCriteriaDIUS09.pdf * *This link leads to a site belonging to an entity not subject to the Official Languages Act. Information on this site is available in the language of the site.
Plan of study
Your plan of study is particularly important. It is one of three scored
components, along with academic achievement and leadership potential.
Applicants should be aware that the responsibility for highlighting the
relevance and reasons behind their choices rests with them. While the Commission
obtains specialist advice on applications, it should not be assumed that the
committee will include a member with expertise in your precise field.
For doctoral applicants, the degree awarding body must be a
UK institution. For split-site doctoral
applicants, the degree awarding body must be a Canadian institution.
In assessing doctoral applicants, particular attention will be paid to
the detailed plan of study. Words in excess of the prescribed length of 500
words will be ignored. This is important since, in addition to examining the
quality of the program, the committee will wish to see evidence of the
applicant's ability to present an argument in a coherent and concise manner.
Factors taken into account will include the following:
For split-site doctoral applicants, particular attention will be paid to the detailed plan of study. Words in excess of the prescribed length of 750 words will be ignored (note that split-site applicants provide a longer text than the doctoral applicants seeking full UK programs). It is essential to:
Factors taken into account will also include the following:
Proposed Institution of Study
Applicants are expected to have undertaken research on suitable institutions of
study. Although every effort is made to take account of applicant's preferences,
it is stressed that the final decision on institution of study will be made by
the Commission, which reserves the right to overrule any preferences expressed
at the application stage. The Commission will consider the suitability of the
study and its value for money when considering any overrule. Please note that
the Commission will be unable to take into account any change of preference
notified by the applicant after 31 January, unless there are exceptional reasons
for this, such as the transfer of a named supervisor, which could not have been
known to the applicant at the time of application.
Independent Applications to
UK Universities
Many institutions have strict deadlines for entry to research programs
(particularly at the Universities of Oxford,
Cambridge and
London ). Applicants must take the necessary steps to
secure admission to their preferred institutions. Applicants should check
admission requirements carefully at the time of application.
Alternative Institution
Unless otherwise stated, it is assumed that institutions are listed in order of
preference. Applicants who indicate that they are not willing to consider
alternatives will be automatically withdrawn from consideration if the
institution(s) that they have indicated are deemed inappropriate by the
Commission, or are not able to offer a place.
Intellectual Property Rights
Collaboration is a feature of doctoral research. The Commission expects that
participants in collaborative projects will develop a collaborative agreement to
clarify the contributions and rights of each partner. The Commission will not
get involved in negotiating an exploitation agreement, but will need to be
assured that an arrangement acceptable to both parties exists.
Arrangements should be made to identify, protect and value any arising
intellectual property and to secure a suitable return to the institution and the
investigators through exploitation. The Commission considers the intellectual
property ownership to lie initially with the students; however, many
universities have their own policy which is locally applicable. In many cases it
is in the best interest of the student for ownership to be vested with the
university which will have greater negotiation powers and will be likely to be
able to seek best returns in any exploitation agreement.
Award holders are expected to notify the Commission when Commission-funded
intellectual property is exploited.
Leadership Potential (Other Achievements)
This section is particularly important. The Commission is keen to support
applicants who combine academic skills of the highest quality with strong
potential to reach positions of influence and to make an impact on wider
society. We recognize that evidence for this could come in several forms.
Examples might include exceptional commitment to a particular field of study,
strong extra-curricular activities, demonstrated ability to overcome adversity,
or social, political or charitable interests. Where possible, applicants should
also demonstrate how the scholarship and proposed course of study would relate
to their future plans, although the commission does appreciate that not all
applicants will have specific careers in mind at this stage. This section will
be given a specific grade in assessing your application, and your own arguments
will raise or lower your marks. Words in excess of 500 words will be ignored.
Reference Letters
The Commission attaches great importance to reference letters from people who are well acquainted with your academic or professional work. Please note that:
Referees should comment as fully as possible on the applicant, keeping in mind the following points for inclusion, as appropriate:
Applicants must complete the Online Application.
Applicants must submit the following supporting documents to complete the application:
Proof of Canadian citizenship: one certified copy of one of the following: birth certificate, citizenship card or passport (do not include original documents). A certificate of baptism is not accepted as proof of Canadian citizenship. Photocopies of certified copies are not acceptable.
Signed Declaration by Applicant found at the end of the online application.
Three letters of recommendation.
Six recent passport-size photographs. Write your full name on the back of one photograph.
Official transcript (one) of all post-secondary studies to date, including those at university, community college and Cégep, either sent directly from the issuing institution or included in your application package in the sealed envelope provided to you by the institution.
Proof of registration for studies in progress, including courses being taken.
One copy of your letter(s) of acceptance (if applicable).
Two sets of artwork samples for applicants in Fine Arts, Music and Architecture. Applicants in the history or theory of art, music, or architecture are not required to submit samples.
Artwork samples required are as follows:
Applicants in the Fine Arts* (painting, graphic arts, sculpture and photography) must submit up to 20 slides of 20 original works. Film-makers and video artists must submit at least one recent film, indicating when it was made, how the applicant was involved in its production and the running time. These must be provided on CD/DVD, be dated, and clearly identified with the applicant's name.
Applicants in Music* must submit CDs of three works totaling no more than 30 minutes. The recordings of singers and instrumentalists must be chosen from three different musical periods, except in the case of Baroque musicians, who must include movements from three different types of pieces. Piano accompaniments may be included. Composers must submit scores and recordings of three different types of works composed by them. All recordings must begin with a spoken declaration by the applicant's music professor that the samples on the recording were performed or written by the applicant and are unedited.
Applicants in Architecture* must submit up to 10 reproductions of drawings, provided on CD/DVD.
*Only samples as specified above will be presented to the selection committee. Samples can be returned following the competition; please indicate the return address. However CBIE, while taking all reasonable care, cannot be held responsible for the loss or damage of artwork samples.
The online application must be submitted by 4:00 p.m. EST, November 2, 2009. Supporting documents must be postmarked on or before this date.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that supporting documents are submitted by the deadline. The selection committee will not accept incomplete files. All required information must appear in the space provided: supporting documents other than those specifically requested will not be accepted.
We strongly recommend that you collect all the required supporting documents in sealed envelopes and send them to CBIE in one package by a method which will provide you with confirmation of its delivery, such as courier service or registered mail.
If you are unable to collect all the required supporting documents, please ensure that your referees and institution(s) issuing transcripts submit the documents directly to CBIE by the deadline. Be sure to identify the name of the scholarship program for which you are applying on all documentation sent to CBIE.
Canadian Bureau for International Education (CBIE)Applicants who are pre-selected by the Canadian Scholarship Selection Committee will be notified in mid-December by CBIE that their applications will be forwarded to the Commonwealth Scholarship Commission in the UK as “nominees”. Nominees will be asked to complete an additional form specific to awards offered by the UK . Further details will be included with the notification.
Those who are not pre-selected will be notified in late December by CBIE.
The Canadian Scholarship Selection Committee is invited to provide about three times more nominations than there are scholarships available, to the Commonwealth Scholarship Commission in the UK . For the 2009-10 competition, 12 nominations were requested for 2 awards. The Canadian nominations are assessed by a member of the Commission's Panel of Advisers with expertise in the subject area concerned, and then by the Commission's Selection Committee in competition with nominees from Australia, Bahamas, Brunei, Cyprus, Malta, New Zealand and Singapore. The Commonwealth Scholarship Commission in the UK will notify all nominees of their decisions in late March.
Candidates will be notified of their provisional selection by the Commonwealth Scholarship Commission in the UK: that is, selection for award subject to the Commission agreeing the terms of admission to the university/institution. Selected candidates will be given a formal Notification of Award – the offer of a scholarship – as soon as terms of admission to the university/institution have been agreed.